![gay men feet tumblr gay men feet tumblr](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/12/a9/bd/12a9bd97942230989e96d919f33afbd4.jpg)
La question du nu masculin est toujours une interrogation, choquant pour les uns ou une simple invitation au sexe pour les autres (mais là c'est comme les femmes).Pour moi c'est juste un questionnement permanent sur mon corps, mon apparence, que j'explore à la fois par l'image et des transformations comme les liens, les marques sur la peau, les dimorphismes du corps.
GAY MEN FEET TUMBLR FREE
I'm once more barefoot and I have distorted the size of my feet to deconstruct my body but is it a fetish image insinuating sexual activity ? I swear I did not intend to provoke any sexual activity with this representation of my own free nude body. I guess I can wear a black modest mist above my pubis without having to pay. You can't see pubic hairs nor my penis (partially hidden behind my feet) because a dark modest mist floating in front of my lower abdomen.įlickr do not say anything about Black Modest Mists (BMM or BM2) though it is very specific about body covering like "see through topless nudity" - does it mean you can wear see through bottom less nudity ? - or nipple covers which will make of your photo a paying photo. To use the community guidelines defining the photos you have to pay to show (but it's always free to look), this time : My second censored nude photography, censored in order to be a free photography. It's as safe as a flower, a kitten or setting sun. I swear I did not intend to provoke any sexual activity with this representation of my own free partially nude body. I think there is a real symbolism in dusty soles but is it foot fetish ? Last but not least, you can see the soles of my feet, the part you are not suppoed to show especially when they are dusty. Does a male nipple with a nipple cover qualifies a photo for payment ? I don't know. You can see one of my nipples but it is a male nipple so ti is free. According to Flickr, wearing nipple covers will make your photo a paying one. No body can tell too if I'm wearing one nipple cover. I look naked but no one can tell if I'm wearing underwear (meaning it would be a free photo) or if f these underwear are g-string (which would make of this photo a paying photo). There's no penis of course because if there was one it would be a paying photo and because it is hidden between my legs. In this one again you don't see anything really except my legs, arms and feet. I've tried to be obedient to the community guidelines defining the photos you have to pay to show (but you don't have to pay to look at). Yes ti was there before but I deleted it wondering if it would be considered as a paying nude. You just do not see the parts of my body that would make me pay to show this photography. My eleventh nude photography but this one is not "censored".